30 July 2012

Rejection

So I am now subjecting this blog to the same fate as my novels - rejection and failure. Today I found out that I had not been selected as one of the five Emerging Bloggers for the Melbourne Writers Festival. For my submission, I had to write up to 500 words on the theme 'Enquire Within'. Although I was slightly doubtful about my 500 words, I did have confidence in this blog being perfect for the gig. I hope that what I write about and the answers that I seek from other writers, publishers and agents respond to many of the questions other emerging writers have.

Earlier this year, I also submitted this blog in the Sydney Writers Centre Best Australian Blogs Award. Whilst I didn't think that it would be the best Australian blog of the year - I did think that it could be in the running for a sub category of new blogs, under 6 months old, or even be on the shortlist for best blogs about writing in Australia.

So I've missed the mark again. To quote Neil Randall - perhaps my writing aspirations, far outweigh my talent. Only time will tell...

When trying to express to my husband how I felt over the news that I had not been selected, I said to him it's like going for a job interview and not getting the job. It's what you feel, when you find out that you're simply not good enough. Some days I don't know how I do it or why I do it - continue putting myself out there, just to be told I'm not good enough.

And the problem with every rejection I get, is that it's not like a race, because I can't see the competition. I have no idea where I have been placed. Was I second? Was I last? Or was I the one that was coming first, but I tripped up half way along? I never know, because I never receive the feedback that I need.

And just as I was feeling really down in the dumps, home with two sick and miserable children, my husband's words from the other night ringing in my ears 'if this was a share house I was living in, I would want to leave' - because the house is never as organised as it should be, because I'm spending every night and every spare moment trying to achieve my dream, and just as I was feeling so rejected and like nothing good was ever going to come of my writing, I heard something dumped by our front door. And when I opened the package left by the postman I discovered two beautiful books from MidnightSun Publishing inside - my very first perk as a blogger. And somehow my faith in this blog and everything I am trying to achieve was restored.


21 July 2012

An indie book a month

I've got a confession to make and you may not like it. You're likely to suspect that I'm a great big phony. But I'm going to tell you anyway, as I want to do something about it...

I've been banging on about all these great indie publishers lately. I've even made lists of my favourites and published them on this blog. I've made assessments of them based on their websites, book covers, blurbs and reviews of their books. I've submitted my manuscript to a couple of them. Some of these independent publishers have even been kind enough to contribute to this blog.

But my confession is that I haven't actually bought or read any of their books. And I am rather ashamed of this.

If we want to have successful small presses that are going to take risks on unpublished writers, then we all need to support them. I'm going to start putting my money (and my time) where my mouth is - I'm going to read one indie-published book by a debut author a month over the coming year. I will then be able to make a more informed assessment of these publishers and the sort of books they are publishing. But more than that, I will be backing these publishers who are probably working against all sorts of odds to publish books that otherwise would never see the light of day. And that is something really worth supporting.


Some resources to check out:

20 July 2012

Indie Publisher – MidnightSun Publishing



According to their website,  ‘MidnightSun Publishing has grown out of a disenchantment with the established publishing houses in Australia. We know there are plenty of fabulous manuscripts about unusual topics floating around, but publishing new and unknown writers poses a big risk. MidnightSun is prepared to take that risk.’ 

MidnightSun Publishing launched in February this year and The Hum of Concrete by Anna Solding was published in March. Their second book Pangamonium by Zanesh Catkin launched today. They are actively seeking new and exciting voices in literary fiction (hooray!). Writer and publisher Anna Solding told us more…

What made you decide to set up your own independent press?
The truth is that I was frustrated about my manuscript being shortlisted for three awards, including Best Unpublished Manuscript Award at the Adelaide Festival Awards, and still not being picked up by a publisher. I had an agent for a while but she gave up on me when she realised how difficult The Hum of Concrete was to sell. In March 2011 I had lunch with a good friend, who is a business man, and he asked me why I don't start my own publishing house. I laughed and replied: 'Because I'm not crazy!' But crazy I was. Together with my friend, I founded MidnightSun Publishing and because we suspected that we might make a few mistakes with the first book, we decided to publish my novel first as a test run. We did make some mistakes, but still ended up with a beautiful book, The Hum of Concrete published in March 2012, which is now getting fantastic reviews.


How many manuscript submissions do you receive a month and how many of these may be of a publishable standard?
We receive about 10-12 manuscripts per month, plus many email queries. It is difficult to say how many are of publishable standard. At the moment, we are concentrating on literary fiction, so all the crime, non-fiction and children's books that have come in have been read but rejected as they haven't been outstanding. Of the literary fiction, we have asked for six or seven full manuscripts since we opened for submissions in February 2012.

What advantages does a smaller press present for authors over larger publishing houses?
We have more time for each book as we only publish two or three per year. MidnightSun spends months on marketing and promotion, then we have a fabulous party to celebrate the launch before continuing on with several months of marketing and liaising with reviewers and bloggers. With a small publisher, the writer gets personalised service and has much more input on cover design, web presence and marketing strategies.


What kind of manuscripts are you currently looking for?
We are mainly looking for literary fiction. Good stories, well told. However, if we get an outstanding manuscript in another genre we will consider it. I would love to publish children's books that my own children could read in the future. The things we are not looking for at this point are genre fiction and poetry.

What are your predictions for the publishing landscape over the next 5-10 years, and what does this mean for authors?
I think smaller, independent publishers have an important role to play. Perhaps this is wishful thinking, but I think there is certainly a gap to be filled by publishers such as MidnightSun who aren't scared to take on manuscripts that the major publishers have rejected because they seemed too difficult to market and sell. I think this will be great for authors as they have a wider choice of publishers to send their manuscripts to. You only need to look at the list of publishers on SPUNC's website to see that small publishing is thriving in Australia. Self-publishing and e-publishing will also keep getting easier and cheaper, which will benefit writers.

Anna Solding, writer and publisher

19 July 2012

Recently in print - Katie O'Rourke



Today is publication day of Katie O’Rourke’s first novel Monsoon Season. Happy publication day, Katie! A few weeks ago, I approached Katie with a series of questions about how she became a published author. Here is what she had to say…

Was Monsoon Season the first book you wrote and how long did it take you to complete?
Monsoon Season is my first book. I started writing it ten years ago and I think I spent the first year walking around thinking about the characters and who they were and what their story would be. I ‘finished’ it and submitted to some agents unsuccessfully. I remember getting a couple responses of ‘we'd love to see your next book’ and I was sort of overwhelmed by that because I didn't have a ‘next book’. So I took a break from it and wrote two other books and then I went back to it with fresh eyes and was able to rewrite it.

How many publishers/agents had you sent your book to before you found one that wanted to publish it?
I mostly focused on agents and I submitted it in various forms over many years. I've lost count, but I'd ballpark it at 50.

Please describe how your relationship started with your eventual publisher Canvas (imprint of Constable & Robinson).
I posted Monsoon Season online at authonomy.com. An editor found me there and expressed interest in reading the full manuscript and then the other two manuscripts I had completed at the time. I was actually a bit sceptical because a lot of the people who approach you online are after you to pay them. I don't think I completely relaxed until I had a signed contract and the advance was in my bank account! That probably took about six months. I don't remember exactly how long I was active on authonomy, but my book was ranked in the sixties when I had to take it down because I had a publishing contract.

Who was the first person you told that you were getting your book published and how was this moment?
I think it was probably my mother and we were on the phone. I was also in the middle of purchasing my first home which was a roller coaster of a process. In my memory, the two things are all mixed together and I felt an extreme gratitude of everything falling into place at once. I was wrong though – the house actually fell through. Luckily the book didn't!

How have you found the publishing process and working with an editor on your book?
That was harder than I expected. I've developed a pretty thick skin when it comes to critique and an ability to filter out advice that doesn't resonate with my vision. I'm the writer. But there's a different balance you have to negotiate when the advice you're getting comes with the weight of being the reason you're getting published at all. Suddenly their opinion counts for more and I found myself struggling with whether I could trust their edits. I ran some advice by trusted writer friends and found it really comforting when they agreed with my editor.

How has becoming an 'in print' writer changed you and where to from here?
I'm still figuring that out. Publication is July 19th and I have two more books coming out after that. It's so exciting. For the last six months, I've been doing more editing than writing and I expect more of that for the next books. I'm looking forward to having time to focus on the writing again soon.

The blurb – Monsoon Season
Riley refuses to call herself a battered woman - she doesn't fit the profile.

When her boyfriend Ben hits her, she doesn't know what to call it. She does know to pack her things and run to the one place that feels safe - home.

Riley discovers she's pregnant and her emotions become tangled. She can't shake the fact that she's still in love with Ben...

A horrific accident then turns Riley's world even more upside down, forcing her to accept help from those around her. Before she can begin to heal, she must learn the difference between being independent and being alone.

Katie O’Rourke's author's site: http://authorkatieorourke.blogspot.com/

12 July 2012

Manuscript nibbles

So finally, someone has expressed interest in your manuscript! You have sent them the first three chapters and a one-page synopsis and they want to see more! Should you crack open the champagne? They say that they will get back to you in six weeks’ time. You tell everyone your exciting news.

Six weeks comes and goes. You hear nothing. You are no longer feeling confident. You wish you didn’t tell so many people. You wonder whether you should follow up, but will it annoy them? But if you don’t follow up, will they forget your manuscript? You are at a loss of what to do…

I wanted to find out more about what happens when a writer receives a nibble on their manuscript. In this series a publisher, an agent and a writer share their experiences.

11 July 2012

Manuscript nibbles - The Publisher



Rebecca Starford is the associate publisher at Affirm Press, a Melbourne-based publishing company committed to publishing books that have a positive impact on the community. Affirm Press publishes new and under-published authors and distinguish themselves through their editorial commitment. Rebecca Starford was deputy editor at Australian Book Review and is the co-founder and editor of Kill Your Darlings.

Your submission guidelines request a short synopsis and the first three chapters of a manuscript. If you request to see more of a manuscript after seeing these, how much should a writer get their hopes up? How often do you request to see more of a manuscript following an initial submission by a writer?
Publishers will often ask to see more material to know if the writing sustains itself, to see how the narrative progresses. I couldn’t give an exact figure on how often we request more – maybe one in 20 or so. A writer must always remain positive, and if a publisher asks to see more, it’s a good sign – but it by no means ensures that the publisher will like the rest of the manuscript. So while I’d never encourage someone not to be hopeful and ambitious, it’s important to keep in mind that the slush pile is always a long shot.

If you do request to see more of a manuscript, how long do you usually tell a writer that you will need to read and respond to it? And how much feedback would you usually give to the writer?
It varies. I like to let writers know within 4 weeks or so from when I’ve requested the whole work, but it’s not always possible. I try to provide as much feedback as possible – it usually amounts to half to one page.

At what point should a writer follow you up, if they have not heard back from you as yet? And how would you like the writer to follow up with you?
I don’t like writers ‘following up’, unless it’s been months and months, in which case a polite email query is fine. But preferably, don’t follow up at all – unless you’ve got another offer from a different publisher, and you’d like to gauge our interest.

If a writer does receive a nibble on their book from Affirm Press, is there anything that they can do to increase their chances of getting a positive outcome?
Not really. Just be patient – calls and emails won’t increase your chances. Publishers and editors are incredibly stretched for time – no one wants to feel like they’re being hassled to read something. So rest assured it’s all under control, and if it’s good news, you’ll know about it sooner rather than later.


Rebecca Starford, associate publisher, Affirm Press

10 July 2012

Manuscript nibbles - The Agent



Virginia Lloyd is an Australian literary agent, editor, freelance writer, and the author of The Young Widow’s Book of Home Improvement, a memoir. She has recently agented the highly successful debut novel of Fiona Higgins, The Mothers’ Group, published by Allen & Unwin. Virginia has edited all of Lily Brett’s novels, including her new novel Lola Bensky that is being published by Penguin Books Australia later this year.

What is it about a query letter that makes you request to see some or all of a manuscript?
It could be any number of things. Sometimes it's a sense of humour and an engaging tone, other times it's an intriguing scenario for a novel, or a nonfiction idea that hasn't been done to death. I post submission guidelines on my website so it's encouraging to see when a writer has responded to the questions I ask them to address in a query, but that in and of itself doesn't mean I'll want to read his or her manuscript. Conversely, if a writer does not address all the things I look for in a query, I won't automatically discount them. If a writer contacts me through a mutual acquaintance then I'm almost always going to ask to see a few chapters because there will usually be a reason that the acquaintance has sent the writer my way.

If you request to see some or all of a manuscript after receiving a query, how much should the writer get their hopes up? How often do you request to see a manuscript following a query?
I request a partial manuscript, usually the first three chapters, pretty regularly. Every time I begin to read the manuscript, I am hoping for something that will surprise me, intrigue me, hook me in, make me laugh. The writer should not get his or her hopes up too much at this stage, however. The unfortunate truth of this stage of the process is that it's entirely a matter of my personal taste combined with a sense of what the market is looking for.

If you do request to see more of a manuscript, how long do you usually tell a writer that you will need to read it and respond to it? And how much feedback would you usually give to the writer?
Typically I tell the writer I'll need two to three weeks. If for some reason I'm delayed I do try to let the writer know. I've heard of writers being told they will have to wait up to 12 weeks for a response! You can schedule, undergo, and start recovering from major surgery in less time than that. If an agent tells you it will take that long, she does not need your business. Find another agent. As for feedback, I have to keep it minimal due to volume, but I try to make one or two broad suggestions.

At what point should a writer follow you up, if they have not heard back from you as yet? And how would you like the writer to follow up with you?
If I've indicated I will get back to the writer within two to three weeks, send me a friendly email after the end of the third week.

What happens if you do take a writer on as a client - what should their expectations be about a publisher giving them an actual contract?
Because of my background as an in-house editor and freelance manuscript developer, I am keen to work with writers who are willing to do more revision prior to my submitting their manuscript to potential buyers. Most unpublished manuscripts need more work of one kind or another. I do not make editorial suggestions for the sake of it, but I know what constitutes a work of publishable quality. If I see a manuscript that has the potential to be of that quality then I will sound out the writer as to his or her willingness to revise. If not, I thank them and move on. Writers must recognise that even when a manuscript is sold to a publisher, the acquiring editor/publisher will herself want to work with the writer to shape the manuscript into its final form. With experienced authors, of course, that is not the case.

If a writer does receive a nibble on their book (from either yourself, or a publisher), is there anything that they can do to increase their chances of getting a positive outcome?
My strategy is to do the important work with the author prior to submitting to publishers, so as I said previously the author must be willing to work with me at that stage before I go shopping around the manuscript. The next most important thing is for me to connect the manuscript with the editors/publishers who are most likely to respond to it. If I show them something that's very polished they know there's less work for them to do if they acquire it. But whether or not a publisher will make an offer for the writer's manuscript depends on so many variables. For example, an acquiring editor/publisher may love a manuscript, but she can't get approval in her monthly acquisitions meeting to make an offer. She may love the manuscript but is publishing something in four months that is just a little too similar in subject matter, so she doesn't want to cannibalise her own list of titles. And it should go without saying, though I'll say it anyway, that a friendly and professional manner goes a long way.

Virginia Lloyd, Australian author, literary agent, corporate and nonprofit writer

4 July 2012

Manuscript nibbles - The Writer



Neil Randall is the author of the unpublished novels The Butterfly and the Wheel, The Holy Drinker, and Trust No One, the short story collection Tales of Ordinary Sadness (available through Ether Books), and a volume of poetry The Careless Loves of a Casual Nazi.

When was the first time that you received a nibble on one of your books and how did this interest in your book eventuate?
My first positive response from an agent was a bit of a horror show. After sending off sample chapters, exchanging emails and a few phone calls, I was offered representation for my first novel. This came on the condition that I paid the agency a fee up front to cover their administrative costs. Thinking it was a small price to pay for what seemed like the Holy Grail at the time – literary representation – I paid the fee, and waited for the offers to roll in. Every few months, I received an email with a list of quotes from various rejection letters, ‘sorry not for us’ etc. This went on for nearly a year, before the agent told me he hadn't been able to place the novel with a publisher. When I delved a little deeper into what he'd actually done on my behalf (and I dearly wish I'd have been far more savvy and asked more questions, rather than going along with everything that was said), I discovered his correspondence with publishers consisted of a copy and paste version of my original letter/email to his agency, and that they hadn't edited or polished my manuscript in any way. So, in effect, he'd done less than the bare minimum for his ‘admin fee’, other than fire off a few cut and paste emails. Since then, I've been told that a writer should never pay any kind of fee to an agent. More importantly, they should check everything out, what's being done for them, who's being contacted etc before signing a contract.

My most recent positive response from an agent came via an email query, which after hundreds of rejection slips from posted submissions over many years left me thinking all those stamps, ink cartridges and paper might have been a waste of money, after all. In this instance, I contacted around a dozen UK agents who accepted email queries. An hour later, said agent requested the whole manuscript. Around ten days after that, she contacted me again, praising my writing skills, but with reservations about the plotline of this particular novel, and suggested we meet in London to discuss the matter further. A few days later we met at her office, had a really interesting and productive conversation about the direction of the book. I left mad excited, with a head full of ideas, and over the next three and a half weeks wrote around 50 additional pages, which, I felt brought the whole novel together. I emailed the agent the new section, with a list of other changes, a new synopsis, and waited. Around a month later I received a brief email. None of the changes were mentioned. She'd just decided to pass on the novel. This was the last thing I was expecting, having built up a bit of a rapport. At worst, I thought the new part of the novel might need more work, or rewriting completely, not a thanks, but no thanks.

How do you manage your excitement when you receive interest in your work?
It's hard not to get excited by the fact that somebody in the publishing industry (after so many rejections) has finally sat up and taken notice of your writing, especially when they're so positive and full of praise. But I think, over time, you learn to keep yourself in check. Writing and disappointment go hand in hand. If you get an agent, there's no guarantee you'll get a publisher, get a publisher, and the book might not sell or the critics might savage it. I think things these days are driven by artificial buzzes. If something is successful, something similar is sure to shift x number of copies, which creates a bit of an unhealthy, samey market place, where everybody is trying to write, champion or sell very similar ideas.

If you haven't heard back from an agent or a publisher by a certain date do you follow up and how do you follow up? And do you think this works in your favour at all?
I know some agents encourage writers to call after a certain time if they haven’t heard back, but I've never done that. Whether chasing people up works or not I don't know. I just feel that if the book is of interest to a publisher or agent, they'd be the ones getting back to you, the writer.

You have been receiving some nibbles on your books. Have you got any plans for what you are going to do next?
With my book Trust No One, I recently had a New York agent request, first, the opening 10 pages pasted into the body of an email, then the opening 50 pages, then the whole manuscript as an attachment. The entire process took over 3 months before they eventually passed on it.

Soon I’ll be sending my new novel The Holy Drinker to agents that accept email submissions, but I don't hold up much hope, and am thinking more along the lines of self-publishing a few things, either via the English Arts Council and/or in e-book format. I've had quite a few shorter pieces picked up by magazines and online publishers and I really want to get them out there in a collection as opposed to having them sitting on my hard drive for the next 20 years!

In regards to The Butterfly and the Wheel, I've had absolutely no interest from any agents in the UK or New York. One publisher who specialises in historical fiction requested the full manuscript but never contacted me again. And with a novel that size (it runs to around 600 pages) I'd really like to place it with an agent or publishing house interested in that type of novel, to give it the chance of becoming the best book it can possibly become. And I think that's what any unpublished writer should be focusing on, beyond agents and getting published, beyond success.

Neil Randall